In R v. Dezman, [1977] AJ No. 689 (Dist. Ct.), the summary conviction appeal court determined that non‑compliance with the observation period, in and of itself, does not constitute evidence to the contrary. The court's reasoning is largely based on the need to connect the operational deficiency with an inaccurate breath reading.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.