The following excerpt is from Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v Toronto Transit Commission, 2017 ONSC 2078 (CanLII):
I am satisfied that the considerations in awarding damages outlined in Jones v. Tsige at paragraph 87 can be adapted to this situation so that a court can calculate damages for wrongfully obtaining breath or fluid samples from employees, should that be the result of the arbitration. Specifically: • the nature, incidence and location of the act will be known; • the effect of the taking of the samples on the health, welfare, social, fine or financial position of employees can be determined; • the relationship between the parties is known; • any distress, annoyance or embarrassment suffered by the employees can be described in evidence; and finally • the conduct of the respondent leading up to and including the taking of the sample is easily described.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.