In Myskiw v. Wynn, supra, Clement, J.A., speaking for the court, felt rule 130(1) (similar in wording to rule 166) could not be invoked in support of the addition of a new party defendant without a court order, because to do so would result in a conflict between rules. At p. 743 he said: "… If it were otherwise, there would be a direct conflict between the time of eight days given by subrule (2) for filing a defence, and the time of 15 days given in the first instance to a defendant by Rule 85." There is no such conflict in our rules. Rule 169 allows a party to plead to the amended pleadings within eight days "or within the time he then has to plead, whichever is longer".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.