Does a party and a party have to pay additional costs to a mortgage?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Central Mortgage and Housing Corp. v. Johnson et al, 1970 CanLII 670 (SK QB):
Lamont, J.A., cited Cotterell v. Stratton (1872), 42 L.J. Ch. 417, L.R. 8 Ch. 295, in support of his conclusion [at p. 799] that the costs are limited to party-and-party "unless in the mortgage the mortgagor has expressly convenanted to pay additional charges".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a mortgage holder entitled to a third party's costs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the addition of words “addition” to a contract between the parties affect the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the costs of appeal costs for the claimant in a case that has been divided between success and success? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there was connivance between the parties in the context of the definition of a party to a marriage contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What remedies are available to a party to a contract where the other party fails to complete the entire contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to security for costs under Rule 9 of the Rules as to costs in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current practice of paying the costs of a party in an abortive trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a mortgagee sue the mortgagor on the basis that the mortgaged property is not in a condition in which it was when the mortgage was signed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the legal consequences if a party agrees to surrender a lease with another party? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a mortgagee who has sold the mortgaged property be reinstated in his right to sue for the mortgage debt? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
