What is the effect of the finding that W.D. was a child in need of protection and the disposition placing her in the care of the Director of Child Protection?
Prince Edward Island, Canada
The following excerpt is from DCP v. A.D.D., J.D. and B.J.T., 2020 PESC 9 (CanLII):
Matheson J. heard two matters in relation to this file. The finding that W.D. was a child in need of protection and the disposition placing W.D. in the care of the Director of Child Protection (the Director) is the subject of this review hearing. Her second decision, in November, 2019, DCP v. A.D.D., J.D. and B.T., 2019 PESC 53 set out the background of the case as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of s. 34(1)(b) of the Child Protection Act, C-5.1? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the appropriate amount of table child support for an adult child? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the "best interests" factors used by a judge to determine whether or not a child should be removed from the custody of the custodial parent and placed with the access parent? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the definition of effective notice in the context of retroactive child support? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the factors used in determining a disposition order granting permanent custody to the Director of Children's Services? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the scope of appellate review in family law matters generally and child protection cases specifically? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for variation in a child protection application? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Is hearsay evidence admissible in a child protection case? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Is relocation of a child by one parent a material change in the circumstances of the child? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) and determines whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial, is it deference? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
