Contributory negligence can be found in such cases because the person having the statutory right-of-way must nevertheless proceed with due care. Taschereau J. in his dissent in Walker v. Brownlee states the right-of-way conferred by statute is not absolute. However, the majority decision in that case and others makes it clear the onus is on the driver without the statutory right-of-way to show how reasonable care would have prevented the accident and this must be done in the face of the dominant driver’s right to expect a clear path and his right not to have to watch out for crossing vehicles. Only when he actually becomes aware of such a vehicle must the dominant driver then take whatever action is reasonable to try to avoid an accident. As Rand J. stated in Walker v. Brownlee at p. 455: ...he was assuming that his right-of-way, clear under any interpretation of the statute, would be respected and it was not. The most that can be said is that the accident might have been avoided: but that is not enough...[Emphasis added]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.