Furthermore, in Logtenberg v. ING Insurance Co., [2008] O.J. No. 3394 (S.C.), the court considered the following questions in determining the propriety of or otherwise consolidation: i. Will the order sought create a savings in pretrial procedures? ii. Will there be a real reduction in the number of trial days taken up by the trials being heard at the same time? iii. What is the potential for a party to be seriously inconvenienced by being required to attend a trail in which that party may have only a marginal interest? iv. Will there be real savings in experts’ time and witness fees? v. Is one of the actions at a more advanced state than the other? vi. Will the order result in a delay of one of the actions? vii. Are any of the actions proceeding in a different fashion? FACTORS WEIGHING IN FAVOUR OF CONSOLIDATION
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.