The plaintiff’s submission was that the consent to the use of the vehicle was vitiated by Jones’ misrepresentation. The plaintiff submitted that fraud vitiates consent. The court was referred to Oppenheimer v. Fraser & Wyatt [1907] 2 KB 50. and the argument advanced that the consent to the use of the vehicle was vitiated by ‘the defendant’s fraud” and there was therefore no consent and the waiver of subrogation did not apply.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.