The standard of review on a contested confirmation of a report from a reference is as an appeal, and not a trial de novo, (see Jordan v. McKenzie (1987), 26 C.P.C. (2d) 193). A court hearing a motion opposing confirmation of a construction lien reference report ought not to interfere with the results unless there is an error in principle, an absence of jurisdiction or a patent misapprehension of evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.