In Taberner v. Ernest & Twins Developments Inc., 2001 BCSC 367, Lowry J. (as he then was) considered whether a Vancouver condominium was “sufficiently unique” to warrant specific performance. He found, at para. 9, that the “combination of features are not to be found in any other property shown to have been on the market” and that “they probably could not have been substantially duplicated in another available condominium unit.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.