Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Royal Bank of Canada v. Madill, 1981 CanLII 2995 (NS CA):
In Holroyd v. Marshall, the subject-matter was machinery, "... which during the continuance of this security, shall be fixed or placed in or about the said mill ...".
Clements v. Matthews (1883), 11 Q.B.D. 808, appears to make a distinction between a bill of sale of growing and other crops which would thereafter be on the farm in question and those which would be on "any other premises of the mortgagor".
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.