How has the court considered one party's receipt of child tax benefits as a factor in the analysis of the s.9 Guidelines analysis?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Samson v. Samson, 2009 BCSC 636 (CanLII):
In some cases, the court has considered one party’s receipt of child tax benefits as a factor to be considered in the s. 9 Guidelines analysis: Johnson v. Johnson, 2007 BCSC 1609 at ¶23, 45 R.F.L. (6th) 418.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court considered student loan payments as a factor in opposing a request for child support under the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when considering retroactive variation of an interim child support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is the court divided child related expenses under the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court consider whether the guardian who is planning to move with the child would do so without the child? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used by the courts to determine custody of a child where the child is being moved? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an expense relates to an extracurricular activity bring the amount of child support under s. 7 of the Child Support Guidelines (e.g. expenses) into s.7 of the child support table? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors applicable to a court's exercise of discretion under s. 18 of the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a child support agreement entered into between the parties binding the parties to child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court considered the contribution made by one party to the other's benefit? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a party can have challenged a foreign court’s procedural defects in that foreign proceeding, can that party collaterally attack the foreign procedural process before the Canadian court at the enforcement stage? (British Columbia, Canada)
