There is a presumption that pre-tax corporate income is available to the payor for purposes of child support. That presumption can be rebutted by the payor spouse producing compelling evidence to support the conclusion that reinvestment is necessary to sustain the company as a viable enterprise: Hausmann v. Klukas, 2009 BCCA 32 at paras. 50-52, leave to appeal ref’d 284 B.C.A.C. 320 (note).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.