British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Andreassen v. Andreassen, 2016 BCSC 1196 (CanLII):
Generally a payor’s capital is not considered money available for child support but income earned on capital is conceptually available for that purpose. In Jeffery v. Motherwell, 2006 BCSC 140, the court discussed the purpose and application of s. 18 and outlines it is the payor’s onus to demonstrate what income or assets of the company are unavailable to him:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.