But the child’s best interests are not necessarily the driving cause for litigation that involves a child. At paras. 21-23 Justice Côté in Metz v. Weisgerber concludes that while a court decides child custody on the basis of what is best for a child, that does not mean the parents’ disagreement and resulting court proceedings are conducted for the interest of that child. Parents litigate custody for their own subjective purposes and reasons: para. 22. In that sense, good intention and conduct is not a basis to refuse to award costs: para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.