[63] On the basis of this criterion, the court in Chan v. Chow found Hong Kong to be the child’s habitual residence as the parties had resided in Hong Kong for an appreciable amount of time (namely 9 months) and the parties had reconciled and moved to Hong Kong as a family with the settled intention of making Hong Kong their home. The present case can be distinguished as the parties have never resided together in one place as a family — in fact they never resided together at all — and the child had never lived in Florida for an appreciable period of time.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.