The defendant argues cause of action estoppel is inapplicable because the causes of action in the two proceedings are separate and distinct. She also points to the decision of this Court in Mohl v. University of British Columbia, 2006 BCCA 70, 265 D.L.R. (4th) 109, and says that cause of action estoppel is inapplicable because the nature of the two proceedings is fundamentally different.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.