Claims similar to the present were considered on an application to strike as disclosing no reasonable cause of action in Bartok v. Shokeir, supra. Pritchard J. concluded that the infant plaintiff’s claim was “a complex, difficult and novel one that treads in substantially unchartered [sic] areas of tort law” and declined to strike it. The procedural test applied there differs from the one before me and I do not consider myself bound to reach the same result here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.