When need overcame the rule against double recovery?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from P.T. v. M.T., 2016 BCSC 316 (CanLII):
See also Prendergast v. Prendergast, 2004 BCSC 1213; and Seebaran v. Seebaran, 2005 BCSC 1801, other cases where need overcame the rule against double recovery.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does evidence as to the recovery of the mother's recovery from addiction meet the test for new evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in B.C. considered the principle against permitting an accident victim to have double recovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for double recovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the exceptions to the general approach of Justice Major to the principle of "double recovery"? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for double recovery in an action for negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the principle against double recovery in tort law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the general principle allow recovery in cases not falling within the traditional categories of recovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety have to be taken into account in the context of double cost calculations? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the considerations that determine whether double costs are appropriate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for recovery for loss of income capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
