Canada notes that a judgment in rem with respect to a claim to an interest in land will not stand against an interested person who is not afforded an opportunity to be heard. (see Coulson v. Secure Holdings Ltd., [1976] O.J. No. 1459 at ¶ 5) Canada also contends that whether or not the court grants the plaintiffs’ title claim, there will be a multiplicity of suits if the Other Bands’ Claims to the overlapping areas remain unresolved.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.