Is an administrative tribunal bound by the rules of fairness and natural justice?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Holloway v. Calgary (City) Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2009 ABCA 392 (CanLII):
In Prassad v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 1989 CanLII 131 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 560, the court stated at 568-69: [A]n administrative tribunal... these tribunals are considered to be masters in their own house. In the absence of specific rules laid down by statute or regulation, they control their own procedures subject to the proviso that they comply with the rules of fairness and, where they exercise judicial or quasi-judicial functions, the rules of natural justice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a breach of the rules of natural justice a ground to quash a decision of a consensual tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the role of the Rules of Civil Procedure in the administration of civil justice in Canada? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the purpose of Rule 217 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by an administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 7(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights require the courts to observe "natural justice" in the context of conflict of law cases? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a solicitor be served as an agent under Rule 16 of the Scottish Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of procedural fairness owed to an administrative body? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of the administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on natural justice and due process? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review on factual findings of an administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
