What is the standard of review on factual findings of an administrative tribunal?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Foster v. Alberta (Transportation and Safety Board), 2005 ABQB 642 (CanLII):
As pointed out in CUPE v. Montreal at para. 85, the standard of review on factual findings of an administrative tribunal is “an extremely deferent one...(o)nly where the evidence viewed reasonably is incapable of supporting the tribunal’s findings will a fact finding be patently unreasonable.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review in the context of standard review on mixed fact and law? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the reviewing judge in an administrative law case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by an administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of the administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a finding of fact by a judge at the Court of Appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a tribunal decision? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing a trial decision? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for findings of credibility in a civil matter? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review under appeal law and what is the scope of review? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an employment tribunal case? (Alberta, Canada)
