The following excerpt is from Mathis v. Hood, 937 F.2d 790 (2nd Cir. 1991):
Mathis v. Hood, 851 F.2d 612, 613-14 (2d Cir.1988) ("Mathis I" ). In Mathis I, the state argued that because the appellate division had affirmed the conviction, the habeas corpus action had become moot. We disagreed. We also rejected the district court's conclusion that Mathis had failed to exhaust his state remedies, so we remanded the case to the district court "to address the merits of petitioner's due process claim and determine what relief, if any, may be available." 851 F.2d at 615.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.