The following excerpt is from Strickland v. Thurman, 874 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1989):
On a petition for a writ of habeas corpus the district court agreed with the state court. The court acknowledged a constitutional right to chosen counsel, but noted that it can be "forced to yield ... when it will result ... in a disruption of the orderly processes of justice unreasonable under the circumstances," citing People v. Courts, 37 Cal.3d 784, 790, 210 Cal.Rptr. 193, 196, 693 P.2d 778, 781 (1985). Finding the continuance request to be unreasonable under the circumstances, the court denied the appellant's habeas petition. Strickland appeals.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.