Can evidence that is relevant and admissible under section 1103 of the California Criminal Code be excluded from trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Driver, G058571 (Cal. App. 2020):
relevant and admissible under section 1103, the trial court may exclude such evidence under section 352. (People v. Tidwell (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 1447, 1456-1457.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a challenge to a trial court's choice to admit or exclude evidence under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1101 of the California Evidence Code prohibit the admission of character or propensity evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 352 of the California Evidence Code preclude a defendant from presenting all relevant evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the power of the trial court to exclude evidence under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1101 of the California Evidence Code prohibit the admission of character or propensity evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
When two or more criminal charges are consolidated for trial against a single defendant, does Section 954 of the California Criminal Code require a separate trial? (California, United States of America)
