The following excerpt is from Tanvir v. FNU Tanzin, 894 F.3d 449 (2nd Cir. 2018):
Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes , in which it held that damages were available under a statute with an explicit private right of action where that statute failed to specify the remedies available. 37 U.S. (12 Pet). 524, 624, 9 L.Ed. 1181 (1838) (stating that to find otherwise would present "a monstrous absurdity in a well organized government, that there should be no remedy, although a clear and undeniable right should be shown to exist").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.