Can counsel make a tactical decision not to object to an argument that the jury would not be reasonably likely to misunderstand?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, B279405 (Cal. App. 2018):

We cannot conclude counsel was ineffective on this record. Counsel had no obligation to make a meritless objection. And a tactical decision not to object to an argument that the jury would not be reasonably likely to misunderstand falls within the range of reasonable professional assistance. (People v. Weaver (2001) 26 Cal.4th 876, 925 ["'[r]eviewing courts defer to counsel's reasonable

Page 89

tactical decisions in examining a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel'"].)

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Try it today free of charge!

The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.

Other Questions

What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)

Can counsel argue that counsel's tactical decisions not to object to a reference to gun possession were tactical considerations? (California, United States of America)

If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)

Is a counsel's failure to object to evidence that counsel reasonably determines would be futile or unmeritorious? (California, United States of America)

In a motion for a writ of habeas corpus, how have courts interpreted counsel's "reasonable tactical decisions" for not objecting? (California, United States of America)

In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)

If a prosecutor has made a number of improper statements in their closing argument, would the defense counsel have been within the bounds of reasonable competence to respond with an objection? (California, United States of America)

Is there any case law where a trial counsel's argument to the jury that a lack of tactical purpose or satisfactory explanation for defense counsel's omission was a tactical error? (California, United States of America)

Does counsel render ineffective assistance by failing to make motions or objections that counsel reasonably determines would be futile? (California, United States of America)

How have courts treated counsel's reasonable tactical decisions in examining a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)

Can counsel make a tactical decision not to object to an argument that the jury would not be reasonably likely to misunderstand?

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Other Questions

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.

Company

Product

Resources