California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Alaniz v. Sun Pac. Shippers, L.P., 261 Cal.Rptr.3d 702, 48 Cal.App.5th 332 (Cal. App. 2020):
Bowman v. Wyatt (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 286, 298, fn. 7, 111 Cal.Rptr.3d 787 [instruction erroneous because it did not list all factors distinguishing employee from independent contractor; no forfeiture because " "the instruction [was] prejudicially erroneous as given, that is[ ] ... an incorrect statement of the law" "].) Here, the instructions on negligence were erroneous because they did not list the required elements of retained control over safety conditions, or that the defendant affirmatively contributed to the injury.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.