The following excerpt is from R.H. Macy & Co. v. Tyler, 193 N.Y.S.2d 243, 21 Misc.2d 998 (N.Y. Cty. Ct. 1959):
'* * * An old state decision, Mitchell v. Home Savings Bank, 38 Hun 255, proceeds on the theory that an assignee of a pass book who read in it the rule against payment without presentation was entitled to believe that possession secured to him the deposit though he gave no notice to the bank. That, however, was before the New York statute permitted payment
Page 246
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.