California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Walker v. Appellate Div. of the Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 14 Cal.App.5th 651, 222 Cal.Rptr.3d 524 (Cal. App. 2017):
Under the statutory scheme, the civil remedy of refunding "all compensation paid" is intended to deter unlicensed contractors by depriving them of all monetary benefit ( 7031, subd.(b)). The restitution statute, in contrast, serves primarily to compensate victims for actual economic losses. Unlike section 7031, section 1202.4 of the Penal Code does not provide for a full refund of all payments to an unlicensed contractor. A victim who is made whole for economic losses under Penal Code section 1202.4 remains able to pursue the civil law remedy of a full refund. ( People v. Vasquez (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1126, 1132, 119 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 ["An order of restitution pursuant to [Penal Code] section 1202.4 does not preclude the crime victim from pursing a separate civil action based on the same facts from which the criminal conviction arose"].) We conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in ordering restitution for the actual
[222 Cal.Rptr.3d 531]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.