Can a rational trier of fact find defendant guilty of assault with a deadly weapon beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tatro, E066301 (Cal. App. 2017):
Based on all of this evidence, a rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty of the assault with a deadly weapon charge beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Ochoa, supra, 6 Cal.4th at p. 1206.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a jury's acquittal of an assault with a deadly weapon constitute an acquittal on the assault charge or a finding of not guilty of assault with deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a rational trier of fact to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a prior assault with a deadly weapon was an assault with deadly weapon or an assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a rational trier of fact to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
