The following excerpt is from Satchell v. Dilworth, 745 F.2d 781 (2nd Cir. 1984):
A pro se plaintiff who brings a civil rights action should be "fairly freely" afforded an opportunity to amend his complaint, even if he makes the request after the court has entered judgment dismissing his original complaint. Bradley v. Coughlin, 671 F.2d 686, 690 (2d Cir.1982). In essence, a pro se litigant should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that he has a valid claim. Under the circumstances here, we think it was unreasonable and an abuse of discretion for the district court to refuse to accept the proposed amendment.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.