Can a physician be held liable for battery under a medical malpractice program?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rains v. Superior Court, 150 Cal.App.3d 933, 198 Cal.Rptr. 249 (Cal. App. 1984):

Defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs' admission of their consent to the use of violence upon them, bars a cause of action for battery because consent to offensive touching is vitiated only where the touching is different in nature from that to which consent was given. Defendants argued that under the rule stated in Cobbs v. Grant (1972) 8 Cal.3d 229, 239-241, 104 Cal.Rptr. 505, 502 P.2d 1, a physician may not be liable for battery upon a patient unless he performs a treatment which is "substantially different" from that to which the patient gave consent. Defendants concluded that because the alleged violent touchings of which plaintiffs now complain are physically identical to the contact consented to, plaintiffs' consent is not vitiated and there can be no cause for battery. Defendants also challenged as unsupported by authority or logic the plaintiffs' theory that their consent is vitiated because it resulted from the "coercive persuasion" employed during the course of the program. 1

Respondent sustained the demurrer without leave to amend. The basis of this ruling was not enunciated.

Other Questions


Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to suppress evidence in a medical malpractice case, has a recommending physician ever been allowed to attach a statement recommending marijuana for medical purposes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for section 1799.110 of the California Medical Code on medical malpractice claims against an emergency room physician? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical malpractice in the context of medical malpractices? (California, United States of America)
Can a medical malpractice claim in an arbitration proceeding be considered "medical malpractice"? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2383 of the California Medical Code, section 490 of the Medical Licence Act, apply to medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
Is section 2337 of the California Medical Board's Medical Licence Review Act, which bars a physician from appealing an administrative decision in the superior court? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of appealing against a recommendation made by the California Medical Board on medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to be held strictly liable in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is an expert who provides emergency medical services in an emergency room qualified to testify in a medical malpractice action? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.