Can a federal district court's interpretation of a statute be reviewed de novo?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Mason, 26 F.3d 134 (9th Cir. 1994):
The district court's interpretation of a statute is reviewed de novo. United States v. Valencia-Roldan, 893 F.2d 1080, 1082 (9th Cir.1990). We find no merit to this argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a federal agency interprets or interprets a statute, does the interpretation or application of the statute need to be reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a statute subject to de novo review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal district court have jurisdiction to review a sentence imposed by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court review a federal sentencing court's decision not to depart from the sentencing guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal judge required to interpret a state statute before the federal courts interpret it first? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
