Can a federal district court retroactively retroactively assess the risk of future use of certain types of medical malpractice?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Shellef, Docket No. 11-876-cr (2nd Cir. 2013):
retrospective findings of impracticality to safeguard against the risk, noted in United States v. Tunnesson, 763 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1985), that district courts will "simply rationalize [their] action[s] long after the fact, in order to cure an unwitting violation of the Act," id. at 78. This argument is unpersuasive for several reasons.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a federal district court retroactively retroactively assess the risk of future use of certain types of medical malpractice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a final judgment from one district court is registered with another district court pursuant to Section 1963, is it treated like a judgment from the other district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for affirming a judgment by a federal district court on any ground that is different than the one relied on by the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a federal district court's opinion and a federal court's decision on sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a federal district court's decision that a plaintiff has been denied access to a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
