California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Kenoth Raymond Bishop, E065543 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defense counsel objected promptly and as specifically as he was allowed. Nevertheless, for no apparent reason, the trial court started overruling all of his objections. Under these circumstances, a request for an admonition would have been
Page 28
futile. (People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 411, 476.) Hence, the objections alone were sufficient to preserve the error.
We turn, then to whether the error was prejudicial. "'"When a prosecutor's intemperate behavior is sufficiently egregious that it infects the trial with such a degree of unfairness as to render the subsequent conviction a denial of due process, the federal Constitution is violated."' [Citations.] . . . Misconduct that does not constitute a federal constitutional violation warrants reversal only if it is reasonably probable the trial outcome was affected. [Citations.]" (People v. Shazier (2014) 60 Cal.4th 109, 127.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.