Can a defendant seek a new trial based on insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Guinn, D058985 (Cal. App. 2012):

Under section 1181, a defendant may seek an order granting a new trial based on insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. When ruling on the motion, the trial court must independently weigh the evidence. (People v. Serrato (1973) 9 Cal.3d 753, 761, overruled on other grounds in People v. Fosselman (1983) 33 Cal.3d 572, 583, fn. 1.) The defendant is first entitled to a decision by the jury, and then independently by the judge, who must consider the sufficiency of the evidence, weigh the conflicts and inconsistencies, and evaluate the credibility of witnesses. In making this determination the court must use its own judgment and does not rely merely on the jury's conclusions. (People v. Navarro (1946) 74 Cal.App.2d 544, 554.) The trial court's ruling, however,

Page 12

Other Questions


Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial on a charge of sexual assault brought by defendant Perez, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, is the evidence insufficient to support his claim of insufficiency of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for insufficiency of evidence in a trial where the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prospective jury at a jury trial be able to reach a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reciprocal obligation to disclose all relevant evidence obtained before trial, including rebuttal evidence it intends to use at trial? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.