California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Salome, D074447 (Cal. App. 2018):
" 'Both the state and federal Constitutions bar the prosecution from introducing a defendant's involuntary confession into evidence at trial.' " (People v. Wall (2017) 3 Cal.5th 1048, 1065 (Wall); see People v. McCurdy (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1063, 1086 [noting the " 'due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment precludes the admission of any involuntary statement obtained from a criminal suspect through state compulsion' "].) "A confession is involuntary if the ' " 'influences brought to bear upon the accused were
Page 29
"such as to overbear petitioner's will to resist and bring about confessions not freely self-determined." ' " ' " (Wall, at pp. 1065-1066.) "However, 'no single factor is dispositive in determining voluntariness . . . rather[,] courts consider the totality of the circumstances.' " (Id. at p. 1066; see People v. Linton (2013) 56 Cal.4th 1146, 1176 [same].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.