Can a defendant's extrajudicial statements (made shortly before the murder), requesting money from his sister, be used to establish the corpus delicti of a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Zapien, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 122, 4 Cal.4th 929, 846 P.2d 704 (Cal. 1993):

Defendant contends that his extrajudicial statements (made shortly before the murder), requesting money from his sister, cannot be used to establish the corpus delicti of the alleged special circumstances. Although it is true that "the corpus delicti of felony-based special circumstances must be established independently of an accused's extrajudicial statements" (People v. Mattson (1984) 37 Cal.3d 85, 94, 207 Cal.Rptr. 278, 688 P.2d 887, fn. omitted), no such error occurred in the present case. 7

" 'The corpus delicti of a crime consists of two elements, the fact of the injury or loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its [4 Cal.4th 986] cause.' [Citation.] Such proof, however, may be circumstantial and need only be a slight or prima facie showing 'permitting the reasonable inference that a crime was committed.' [Citation.]" (People v. Jennings, supra, 53 Cal.3d 334, 364, 279 Cal.Rptr. 780, 807 P.2d 1009.) "[T]he quantum of evidence the People must produce in order to satisfy the corpus delicti rule is quite modest...." (Id. at p. 368, 279 Cal.Rptr. 780, 807 P.2d 1009.)

The jury in the present case was instructed correctly regarding the corpus delicti rule, and there was some evidence of each element of the special circumstances independent of defendant's statements. Specifically, the testimony of Marci Gonzales that her mother offered defendant "the money and the jewelry" is evidence tending to establish the occurrence of an attempted robbery, a reasonable inference being that the victim's offer was made in response to a demand from her assailant for money and jewelry. This is sufficient to satisfy the corpus delicti rule. (People v. Jennings, supra, 53 Cal.3d 334, 367, 279 Cal.Rptr. 780, 807 P.2d 1009.)

Penalty Phase Issues

9. Admission of Evidence of the Circumstances Underlying Defendant's 1973 Conviction of Voluntary Manslaughter

At the penalty phase of the trial, records of defendant's 1978 conviction of robbery

Page 155

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between statements made by a defendant at the time of a search for illegal drugs in his bedroom closet and statements made during the search? (California, United States of America)
In a dual jury trial where two defendants have admitted extrajudicial statements against one defendant, what is the procedure in which one of the juries is to be excused? (California, United States of America)
Is the error in failing to suppress a defendant's extrajudicial statements made without a proper Miranda admonition harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a duty to instruct the jury on its own motion concerning the crime of being an accessory after the fact as a lesser included crime of accessory to murder? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's opinion that the death penalty should be imposed automatically on a defendant who has committed other crimes such as murder not a murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing personal jurisdiction against a defendant who allegedly made defamatory statements on the internet? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a charge of murder be used to establish first degree murder under the felony-murder rule? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.