The following excerpt is from Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1981):
This situation is analogous to a defendant's rejection of an offer of appointed counsel for appeal when appointment is discretionary. That defendant cannot then claim that the state infringed on his constitutional right of access by not providing him with another method of access, such as a law library. Bell v. Hopper, 511 F.Supp. 452, 453 (S.D.Ga.1981). His only option is to proceed pro se. Id. at 453.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.