The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983):
Appellants argue that this instruction is erroneous, in that a person can be convicted without any knowledge of the true nature of the weapon, i.e., without knowledge that a perfectly legal weapon had been converted to be automatic. We will reverse in this case only if there is error and if there is a reasonable possibility that error materially affected the verdict. United States v. Valle-Valdez, 554 F.2d 911, 916 (9th Cir.1977).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.