Can a court order possession of a controlled substance impliedly regardless of its legality?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Roberts, H040091 (Cal. App. 2015):
requirement may be derived. In this case, the court entirely prohibited possession of any controlled substance, impliedly regardless of its legality. The court may regulate or prohibit otherwise lawful conduct. (See People v. Olguin, supra, 45 Cal.4th at pp. 379-380.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is possession of a controlled substance necessarily included in a charge of possessing the same controlled substance for the purpose of sale? (California, United States of America)
Is possession of a controlled substance for the sole purpose of disposing of it a defense to criminal possession of the controlled substance? (California, United States of America)
Does the jury instructions that the trial court relied on in its tentative order and in its final order deny defendant's petition that the jury must find that the killing was committed with either express or implied malice or otherwise implied malice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
When will a court overturn a conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court amend an order made by the Superior Court of Justice in a case not before the court? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court change the charge of simple possession of marijuana to the charged offense of possession of possession for sale? (California, United States of America)
If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
When a judgment of divorce is not self-executing in respect of any division of property ordered, does the court have jurisdiction to make further orders to compel obedience to the order? (California, United States of America)
