The plaintiff argues that the action for the infant, Nadine, is not out of time by virtue of: i) the decision in Campbell v. Fang; ii) section 59 of the Limitation of Actions Act; iii) a discoverability requirement in section 59 of the Limitation of Action Act; and/or iv) a discoverability requirement in section 55 of the Limitation of Action Act. I will now deal with each of these arguments in turn. i) Campbell v. Fang:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.