Does the mandatory term “shall” apply to corollary relief actions in divorce actions?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Thompson v. Thompson, 2007 ABQB 715 (CanLII):

Rule 244.1 uses the mandatory term ‘shall’. However, it is silent with respect to its applicability to divorce actions. The Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) does not prescribe a limitation period for a corollary relief proceeding for spousal or child support. Courts have noted from time to time this absence of a limitation period with respect to a divorce action and claims for corollary relief. See for example Vertes J.'s comments in Rowe v. Rowe, [2007] N.W.T.J. No. 83, 2007 NWTSC 78 (CanLII) at para. 16.

Other Questions


Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge order that a constructive trust action be used in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the meaning of intent without corresponding action in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the principle of res judicata apply when one party has brought a new cause of action against the same party? (Alberta, Canada)
Does Rule 753.11 apply to an application that seeks declaratory relief? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the multiplicity principle apply to an action against a lawyer? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Wife have a claim against the Husband under the Divorce and Divorce Act? (Alberta, Canada)
Can events arising from a prior action be the foundation for a new action? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s.32 and the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to separate actions in a Statement of Claim and Counterclaim? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the discoverability rule of limitations apply to the discoveryability of a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.