Is there any case law where a trial counsel improperly elicited evidence from defence witnesses in cross-examination?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. V.J., 2017 ONCA 924 (CanLII):

Finally, the appellant complains that trial counsel violated the rule in Browne v. Dunn when he elicited evidence from defence witnesses about matters that had not been put to the complainant in cross-examination, and that this adversely affected the outcome of the case.

Other Questions


How has the Court of Appeal in B.C considered trial counsel’s performance on the basis that the performance of the trial counsel did not undermine confidence in the verdict? (Ontario, Canada)
Does having the father present his case first, including evidence presented by the father and his witnesses, result in the mother’s counsel eliciting information from the mother without first putting the issue to the father? (Ontario, Canada)
If a defence expert has been videotaped at trial, is the defence expert required to be reviewed by the other defence expert? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it reasonable for two counsels to stand trial on an undefended trial over two days? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the defence of due diligence apply to regulatory regulatory offences where the defence against due diligence is to be assessed by the trial court? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the trial judge reviewed the evidence at a jury trial? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the trial judge considered the totality of evidence at trial for impaired driving? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of improper use of surveillance evidence in a trial by ambush? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of defence counsel not pursuing the issue at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a witness’s employment background on the evidence at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.