What is a "juristic reason" for the enrichment of a property?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from D.E.G. v. C.J.M., 2016 BCSC 1139 (CanLII):
Brown v. Manuck, 2015 BCSC 1966, provides the following definition of a “juristic reason” for the enrichment, and a description of what is required to entitle a plaintiff to the remedy of a constructive trust:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for the absence of juristic reason for enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a contract be used as a juristic reason for enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a juristic reason for the enrichment received by D.A. as a result of his employment benefits? (British Columbia, Canada)
When one spouse excludes property that is real property, is that a spouse entitled to an undivided half interest in the increased value of the property? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there has been a juristic reason for enrichment in a common law relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
If there is enrichment and a corresponding deprivation, does the court have to determine whether there was a juristic reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a contract be used as a juristic reason sufficient to defeat a claim of unjust enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a juristic reason in a claim for wrongful enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a joint tenant of a property owned by a deceased spouse entitled to claim the property from the deceased? (British Columbia, Canada)
