What are the implications of the principles laid down in Bird Construction principles for non-dangerous defects?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Arctic Foundations of Canada Inc. et al., 2009 MBQB 309 (CanLII):
I note that in Heinicke v. Cooper Rankin Limited et al., Simonsen J. was asked to expand the principles laid down in Bird Construction to include non-dangerous defects. That argument was rejected.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for finding that the principles of constructive, implied or resulting trust are an alternate remedy under the provisions of the Family Law Act, 1986? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any basis in principle to sustain a tort action against the builder of a dangerously defective garden wall? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a constructive trust invoked by the wife in a separate civil action against the husband be considered a remedy of constructive trust? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles of fundamental justice in the extradition context? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of "the law of the law" in the context of Inland Revenue Com'rs? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to sue for damages from a defective roof? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the principle of implied or expressed in the context of a deposit under a contract? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the principle of the rule on a contract where a party is bound by their own word? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the implications of a common-law partner’s claim in equity for the sale of their jointly-held land? (Manitoba, Canada)
