What is the burden of proving that a party making an offer to a prospective buyer of a dog is reasonable to expect that the offer ought to have been accepted?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Harder v Poettcker, 2017 BCSC 1407 (CanLII):
The party making the offer, the defendant here, bears the onus of proving that the offer ought to reasonably have been accepted (BCSPCA v. Baker, 2008 BCSC 947 at para. 36).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is an offer not an offer that ought reasonably have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a court have any authority or authority to award double costs for failure to accept an offer that ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing whether an offer ought to have been reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the argument that reasonable counsel ought to have encouraged the respondent to accept an offer of financial support? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for refusing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party has been awarded double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an offer is reasonably reasonable to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
