What is the impact of hindsight analysis when considering whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cruise Connections Canada v. Cancellieri, 2013 BCSC 1 (CanLII):
A hindsight analysis is not appropriate when considering whether an offer to settle ought reasonably to have been accepted: Bailey v. Jang at para. 24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of hindsight analysis when assessing whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an offer is reasonably reasonable to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors are considered to determine whether a plaintiff accepts an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine whether an offer to settle was open for acceptance? (British Columbia, Canada)
