Is an arbitrator required to give full effect to the acquittal of the grievor?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 279 v. Ottawa (OC Transpo), 2007 CanLII 41425 (ON SCDC):
The applicant ATU contends that as the arbitrator in Toronto v. CUPE was required as a matter of law to give full effect to a conviction, so too were the arbitrators in this case required as a matter of law to give full effect to the acquittal of the grievor.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review required by arbitrators to give full effect to the acquittal of the grievor? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an arbitrator be required as a matter of law to "give full effect" to a conviction? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of requiring an updated assessment where the initial assessment only provides recommendations based on part of the picture? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party in a family law case refuse to pay the arbitration fees of an arbitrator? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a ruling made by an arbitrator in the course of an arbitration? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for admitting or denying a grievor's evidence at a grievance arbitration? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the requirement of uberrima fides apply when the parties have entered into a separation agreement requiring the parties to pay support for the children of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of Local 79's decision not to refer the suspension to arbitration? (Ontario, Canada)
